Colombia

Revocation of the Mandate

The Revocation of the Mandate is one of the mechanisms of participation introduced to the constitutional reform in 1991 by the Constitutional National Assembly for the purposes of strengthening the channels of representation and democratization, in order to promote political and cultural pluralism, and to overcome clientelism, corruption and excessive centralization. The revocation of the mandate is defined by the Law as a political right, through which citizens express their willingness to terminate the mandate they have conferred on a governor or a mayor. In order to present a Mandatory Revocation, citizens must submit to the respective Registrar their request supporting the corresponding motivation and the required percentages of signatures not less than 40% of the total votes that the elected candidate obtained. The revocation of the mandate was initially introduced for all positions of popular election, although it was finally only adopted for mayors and governors. Approximately 134 revocation attempts have been made, but none of these succeeded either because of rejected and insufficient signatures, or because they were voted on but did not obtain the necessary threshold, or because they were pending voting or in the process of appeal, or because they were closed or in one case because the Attorney General dismissed the mandate before the vote.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
sporadic
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
citizens  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a binding decision  
Co-Governance
no 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case