#ExijoSaber Hackathon
The #ExijoSaber Hackathon (lit. I demand to know) brought together programmers and entrepreneurs to develop computer solutions to issues of access to public information, fighting corruption and improving the efficiency of public resource management. The teams worked for 36 hours to develop technological proposals based on nine different challenges based on contributions from individuals and institutions, public and private, involved in the public administration of central and municipal governments.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- open
- Type of participants
- citizens civil society private stakeholders
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields no decision
- Co-Governance
- no
Means
|
Ends
|