Ecuador

Improvement of the socio-educational conditions and institutional strengthening in the Cotacachi Educational District

The "improvement of the socio-educational conditions and institutional strengthening in the Cotacachi Educational District" is an initiative promoted by the Esquel Foundation NGO with financing of the Junta de Castilla y León and International Cooperation NGO of Spain. The initiative is carried out through the methodology of a "minga" (collective work for the good of the community) where the educational community participates to reach the goal that the children of the canton who are part of the bilingual intercultural education - primarily indigenous children - have access to quality education and do not abandon their studies. The work plan contemplates three main ideas for activities: the adaptation of infrastructure and facilities of bilingual intercultural schools (Span. EIB); the strengthening of institutions and training of teachers in teaching methodologies with techniques to improve their classes and levels of education; and the sensitization to the educational community (teachers, parents, and students) on the right to education for boys and girls. This initiative was carried out jointly with the Intercultural Bilingual Undersecretariat and its technical team and the Cotacachi Educational District Coordination, from October 2015 to October 2016. The project sought to benefit 3190 indigenous children, educational authorities, teachers and parents, in addition to 34 educational units and community networks.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case