Ecuador

National Project of Participatory Technological Innovation and Agricultural Productivity

The National Project of Participatory Technological Innovation and Agricultural Productivity is carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture and Fisheries (Span. MAGAP) with the purpose of promoting the productive reactivation of small and medium producers in the agricultural sectors, ranching, forestry, agroforestry, aquaculture and artisanal fishing. In addition, MAGAP proposed a line of work focused on family agriculture that includes the Participatory Agricultural Innovation System (Span. SITPA) as a motor for rural development that integrates the demand of peasant organizations with state supply and environmental responsibility within a Framework of formation of the New Rural Citizen. Among its functions, this program contributes to the increase of the production of the main crops of the country, within a learning dialogue for the small and medium agricultural and technical producers, through the innovation of participatory technologies to be implemented at the national level. Also, to execute the actions, the program designed a methodological tool denominated as the Schools of the Agrarian Revolution (Span. ERA); a space where producers and technicians learn skills, share knowledge through dialogue, and begin learning local management towards the fight against poverty and to achieve Sumak Kawsay or Good Living.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
no 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case