Collective Reparations to the Peasantry and Territorial Peace
The National Association of Peasant Reserve Zones (ANZORC) and the Center for Peace Studies (Cespaz), financed by the Consultancy for Human Rights and Displacement (COHDES) and USAID, coordinated an initiative that seeks to build proposals leading to collective reparations for peasant victims of the armed conflict in Colombia. In order to draft this proposal, workshops were held in regional hubs, where peasants were invited to diagnose how the conflict has affected their human rights, and how they consider that a reparation that promotes peace and responds to the territorial particularities of the communities can be implemented.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- restricted
- Type of participants
- citizens
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision
- Co-Governance
- no
Means
|
Ends
|
