Colombia

National Agreement of Minimum Reconciliation and Peace

The National Agreement of Minimum Reconciliation and Peace is the result of a process that took place between 2009 and 2010, which sought to gather and discuss, among different members of society, proposals on building a better future for a country reconciled and in peace, for human dignity, economic balance and human social development. It was also intended to integrate the whole proposal on reconciliation and peace building into the National Development Plan of 2010-2014. Regional brainstorming events and forums were held in 23 cities, with representatives from more than 160 municipalities. In total, 35 social sectors were present in wide ranging face-to-face and virtual deliberations, including public and private, civil society, academia, government and organizations of national and international origin. From the contributions of all, the structure and content of the so-called National Accord was built beginning with eight minimums, considered by the participants as the central elements necessary for Colombian society to reconcile and build peace. The eight minimums of the National Agreement were welcomed in some aspects of the National Development Plan and were also included in some departmental, municipal and district development plans.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case