Colombia

National Students' Table

The National Students' Table (Span. Mesa Amplia Nacional Estudiantil - MANE) was created by students of higher education institutions in 2011, as part of the protests and mobilizations against the higher education reform as dictated by Law Nr. 30 of 1992. The main objections of students to such reform, presented by The National Government with the leadership of the Ministry of Education, were related to privatization and indebtedness to access higher education. As a protest, students from the vast majority of public and private universities conducted multiple student strikes that lasted for about a month, with the support of different student organizations and groups and unions. Finally, the Government agreed to withdraw from Congress the bill that promoted the reform. Next, the university students gathered in the National Students' Table MANE to work on an alternative proposal to the bill to improve the quality of education in the country, based on a discussion with all sectors, including the Government. In 2014, MANE resurfaced to give its considerations on the new proposal of the Government and the Ministry of Education in relation to the higher education, called "Agreement for Higher Education 2034".

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
sporadic
Mode of selection of participants
both 
Type of participants
citizens  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
no 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case