Colombia

District Council of Culture for the LGBTI Social Sectors

The District Council of Culture for the LGBTI Social Sector is part of the Subsystem of Culture of Ethnic Groups and Social Sectors and Age Groups of the District System of Art, Culture and Heritage of the Capital District. This Council is one of the District Councils for Culture of the Social Sectors, which are settings for the meeting, deliberation, participation and coordination of public and private policies, plans and programs and the respective strategic lines of investment for the cultural development of the Social sectors of Bogotá. In this case, for the LGBTI community. Representatives of the Local Councils of Art, Culture and Heritage participate in the Council and collaborate with the communities and the district administration. Initially, the District System of Culture was created in 2002, but it was not until 2007 that a subsystem was created for these social groups, when a reform was made to this System and the District System of Art, Culture and Heritage was established and as part of this, the Subsystem of Cultures for Ethnic and Rural Poor Groups and Communities, women, and rural and social populations and sectors; which included the District Council of Culture for the LGBTI Social Sectors. Subsequently, in 2009, the Subsystem was modified and renamed as the Subsystem for Ethnic Groups and Social Sectors and Age Groups, which also included the District Council of Culture for the LGBTI Social Sectors within the District Cultural Councils for the Social Sectors.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case