Future State International Conference 2016
The Future State International Conference 2016 was a space promoted by the Laboratory for Government of the Government of Chile and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) so that public sector stakeholders, representatives of the private sector, social entrepreneurs and civil society organizations working in the field of public innovation could together think about how the States and governments should look in the future. Among the questions that guided the debate were: how to promote innovation processes in the public sector that have at their center the collaboration between people and the creation of public value; what (where) are some of the best examples of this way of innovating; what are the barriers and challenges to innovate within the State; what institutions do we need to create for these tasks; what skills do we need to develop; what value do we attach to technology and new knowledge; and, what role should citizen participation or the private sector play? More than 500 participants, experts and stakeholders, including Ministers, heads of services, officials, academics and public innovators participated in the event.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- only backed by a governmental program or policy
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- restricted
- Type of participants
- citizens civil society
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields no decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|
