Brazil

Web-citizenship Xingu

The participatory contest "WebCitizenship Xingu" was a process organized by the Instituto Cidade Democratica in 11 cities of Pará: Altamira, Anapu, Brasil Novo, Gurupá, Medicilândia, Pacajá, Placas, Porto de Moz, Senator José Porfírio, Uruará and Vitória do Xingu . These cities were organized in 4 poles: Altamira, Uruará, Pacajá and Porto de Moz. In each pole, open calls were launched to transform the region according to the preferences and initiatives of the community itself. Through 5 stages, citizens could: 1) bring inspiration from good practices in other places, 2) make concrete proposals for the locality, 3) vote for the proposals preferred by the participants, 4) unify similar proposals among themselves?, and 5) announce the final winners of the contest. The proposals are selected by 5 categories: a) proposals from citizens, b) proposals from public servants, c) proposals from organized civil society, d) proposals from young people under 29 years of age, and e) proposals from trade unions. In total, 21 winning proposals were selected, which were presented to the Xingu Regional Sustainable Development Plan Management Committee (PDRS) and also to the regional and municipal governments.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case