Brazil

Public Ombudsman System Debate

Debate do Sistema Público de Ouvidoria (lit. Public Ombudsman System Debate) was an online debate held by the Ministry of Justice and Controladoria Geral da União (CGU), in 2013, to discuss the formulation and implementation of a public ombudsman system. The debate was centered in two axes: 1. a draft of an Executive Decree to create and regulate the Federal Public Ombudsman System, SiOuv, and a structured discussion on questions on general topics related to the drafted proposal. The online debate was just one part of a broader discussion. First CGU and the Ministry of Budget and Planning performed a technical study to collect and systematize rules related to federal ombudsmen, which was followed by a general meeting of public ombudsmen, who presented the discussion about the Federal Ombudsman System and collected subsidies for drafting a regulation. The online debate followed these discussions and the process was also subsidized by present discussions with civil society, Public Policy Councils, ?Caravanas das Ouvidorias?, among others.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case