Brazil

An Eye on the Goals

De Olho nas Metas (lit. An Eye on the Goals) is a web based platform created with the goal to facilitate the access to the policy plans established by the Mayor of Sao Paulo. Each term, the local government publishes its goals for the following years; the platform, therefore, maps the level of implementation with a progress bar and a list of the stages, so far, accomplished. The website uses the information published by the official website of Sao Paulo's government created to monitor the policy plan for the term of 2013-2016 - Planeja Sampa - and information from the Sao Paulo's Court of Auditors related to the execution of goals by private sector stakeholders. The goal of De Olho nas Metas was, also, to aid the work of the more than the 30 Participatory Councils of the City of Sao Paulo. Citizens could also monitor the implementation of the plans through a map of the city. Besides monitoring, citizens could post comments and upload pictures related to the policy plan. There is also an exclusive feature for members of the Participatory Councils, where they follow specific projects and areas of interest. The term of 2013-2016 had 123 policy plans. De Olho nas Metas is a project by the NGO Rede Nossa Sao Paulo in partnership with Eokoe and the MIT Center for Civic Media with support from Fundación Avina and technical cooperation with the Court of Auditors from the City of Sao Paulo.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
both 
Type of participants
citizens civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case