Uruguay

National Dialogue on HIV and Human Rights

The National Dialogue on HIV and Human Rights was carried out in 2013 upon the initiative of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the Ministry of Public Health, the Ministry of Social Development, and of civil society organizations. This Dialogue has also taken place in other countries in Latin America, and follows a standardized methodology created by the UNDP. It included a time of 45 days to present specific cases of violations of human rights, good practices and recommendations, which was discussed in a plenary with technical support to elaborate concrete proposals. It culminated in a forum of the public sector and civil society organizations, where the objective was to agree on concrete actions that favor adequate legal frameworks for the protection and promotion of the rights of people with HIV, as well as mechanisms of enforceability and sanctions. The national dialogue was considered as an input to the HIV / AIDS draft law from a human rights perspective, launched in 2014.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case