Uruguay

Evaluation Conference on the Criminal Code Reform

As part of the reform process of the Criminal Code, which went through conflictive stages and had received strong criticism from civil society, an Evaluation Conference on the Criminal Code Reform was held in December 2015. It was convened within the framework of the "Justice and Inclusion" Program, at the initiative of the Presidency of the Republic, the Constitution and House Rules Commission of the Parliament, and with the support of the European Union. The Conference was conceived as a mechanism additional to the existing Advisory Commissions of the House of Representatives, with the specific aim of opening a dialogue space between the different civil society stakeholders. All social organizations interested in contributing to the parliamentary debate on the reform of the Criminal Code were invited to participate. The Conference had a Rapporteur who protocolled the sessions and created a final document reflecting agreements and contributions.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case