Public Policy Dialogues "Thinking Peru in 2016"
The Public Policy Dialogues were part of the "Thinking of Peru 2016" initiative of the Institute of Peruvian Studies, along with several international agencies of cooperation and civil society organizations, which brought together representatives of these sectors around 5 debates to elaborate on proposals and agendas on specific themes, facing the elections of the year 2016. From these meetings, 13 public policy documents were created that identified problems, proposed improvements to existing measures and developed alternative proposals to improve state action. The recommendations address the areas of health, education, decentralization, justice, water and sanitation, financial inclusion, sustainable urban mobility, prevention and management of social conflicts, environment, health, fisheries, productive diversification and decentralization of health. These documents were also sent to the candidates for the 2016 elections, demanding the taking of a stand in front of the issues and problems raised.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- both
- Type of participants
- citizens civil society
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision
- Co-Governance
- no
Means
|
Ends
|
