Public Hearings to discuss the Officious Pretrial Detention
The ?Public Hearings to discuss the Officious Pretrial Detention? were a number of working tables organized by the Political Coordination Board of the Mexican National Congress to discuss the constitutional reform proposal for the Article 19, regarding the extension of the Officious Pretrial Detention to new offences. The audiences lasted 3 days and various actors participated in them, including: legislators, representatives of the judicial branch, scholars, human rights defenders, civil society organizations and private sector representatives. At the end of the Public Hearings, the majority of participants spoke out against the expansion of the Officious Pretrial Detention to new offences.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- only backed by a governmental program or policy
- Frequency
- sporadic
- Mode of selection of participants
- restricted
- Type of participants
- civil society private stakeholders
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|
